








The
War is terrible, but all resources are called on and all media
are used in its furtherance. The relatively newly-developed art of Sound
Recording was no exception and was pressed into service early. The most obvious
use was as a vehicle for the patriotic songs that inevitably appear when a war
breaks out. Freshly recorded National Anthems of the Allies were made, and so
on. But ‘Descriptive Records’ also appeared from earliest times. These would
enact or re-enact battles, speeches, events etc., for the public at home to
listen to, and marvel at the bravery of ‘our troops’ (though they knew that
already). Better still, able-bodied men who had not yet enlisted may have been
persuaded to do so by these records.
The earliest war Descriptive record I ever had was a
Therefore, compressed into the slender compass of 2 minutes was a
stylised, or symbolic, representation of a battle. Had the Russians won, the
Anthems would merely have been reversed, the one appearing last signifying
victory, of course!
There are doubtless many earlier examples of War Descriptive
Records, (e.g. the Spanish-American War of 1898 must have produced some), but
the above example is probably typical.
The Great War naturally called into being large quantities of
these records. I’m not a specialist in these, but have heard a few. These are
usually much more elaborate than the 1905 cylinder. Disc records lasted longer,
recording was (generally speaking) better… and besides, much more was at stake
in
All the different record companies produced such issues,
naturally. Columbia, for instance, produced a four-sided set called ‘The Big
Push’. But the one you can hear now has
struck me as being somehow more convincing than any of the others I’ve heard.
It’s a Diamond record, called ‘The Battle Of the Marne’. This
Diamond label was a substitute for Pathé records during WWI in
I don’t mean this record sounds other than a pathetically
inadequate set of poorly made and recorded sound effects. A snare drum hit for
a single rifle shot… repeated hits for a machine gun; a bass drum (which would
record badly, if at all, on most acoustic systems) to represent heavy
artillery; a siren whistle for the whine of the shells…
And the dialogue: to us today, it is stilted, predictable,
jingoistic, patronising; the men marching up, whistling a song; the colonel
speaking of the glory of the
Most of the WWI Descriptive records have these sounds and
contents.
But, as I said, this one seems to me to be different, and more
immediate somehow. There are more people taking part, so the ‘crowd scenes’ are
more convincing… the bugle calls set an atmosphere (they’re accurate; a
military historian friend of mine has checked them for me). There are
commendable touches like the (cocoanut shell) horse riding up, then snorting
fairly authentically. At the end of the Colonel’s address, a soldier shouts out
‘Kill ’em!’ (normally on these records, there is a greater sense of chivalry; I
think the people at home were more comfortable with that). Also, the record
does not end in a triumphant victory march… it just fades out, without any
proper conclusion. I spent quite a bit of time transferring this record and
tinkering with the sound, so I got ‘drawn into’ it. Eventually I found the
shell-burst with the ensuing screams of the wounded becoming more and more
startling: indeed horrible, as my imagination got to work…
In the end, I concluded that if sound recordings made during the
start of a battle in The Great War actually existed (which they don’t, of
course): then this really is what
they would have been like! In other words, primitive and amateurish as this
disc sounds to us today, it nevertheless carries in its long-obsolete,
vertically-modulated groove, some elusive element of reality…
Just click this link to hear the mp3 file:
Page
written 25th September 2002.
Revised
26th September 2006.