








Scans of British 78 rpm record labels.
All
of us 78 rpm record fans enjoy, above all, listening to our discs, right? But
it is also interesting, sometimes, just to look at the labels of 78s, be
they common, or – better still! – rare!
Below
are links to .jpgs of several hundred labels. Alas, many of them are in very
poor condition. This is because (a) the only example of a label I have is in
bad shape; (b) earlier scans I made were with an old scanner, not very good. Or
both. And probably I don’t have the records any longer, so a better scan cannot
be made. But still: a faded, dilapidated scan of a rarity like a ‘Neptune
Record’ is better than no scan at all?
The
noted discographer Dr. Rainer Lotz of Germany, advised me several years ago
(when this page was first started), to adopt ‘the broad approach’ to what
constituted a ‘British’ record. I was very happy to adopt his wise counsel, as
he set it out in his superb “Discography” ‘German Ragtime’ (Storyville, 1985).
I quote from Rainer’s introduction, only changing ‘Germany’ to ‘Britain’:
“…
this [web-page] deals not only with items actually recorded in Britain, but
also with:
-
all items manufactured in Britain irrespective of the country of recording;
-
all items manufactured in Britain irrespective of the country of destination,
i.e. even series made exclusively for export;
-
all items which, although recorded in Britain, have never been available on
media made in Britain.”
To
which I can add very little, except: - all items that were sold in Britain,
even though they were recorded & manufactured elsewhere. E.g. the
single-sided Imperial discs and Edison Diamond Discs, both of which were
recorded & manufactured in the U.S.A. and then imported to this country.
Ironically,
these two special cases are by an incalculable margin outweighed by the
number of records that were recorded and pressed in Germany, and imported to
Britain during the “European-based Gramophone Boom”, which occurred about 1908
– 1914. This period is of great interest to many enthusiasts, and no apology is
made for their predominance here. Literally hundreds of labels are to be
found in this short but fascinating time period!
Accordingly,
no especial attempt is made here to illustrate labels much after the mid-1930s,
and hardly at all for those existing after World War II (1939-1945). In any
case, these are very well covered by many websites.
(Still, a number of exceptions exist
below which violate the above rules… hopefully these will gradually be
rectified, and assigned to the ‘World Wide Labels’ web-page. Also, many of the
descriptions should have been revised as another example of the label was
added, but I had to give up on that one as ‘painting the
CAUTION! Unless otherwise credited, all
dates, attributions and opinions are those of the author, and may be incorrect.
Also, I have made every attempt to give proper credit to the kind and generous
people who have donated scans for use on this website; and also to those have
made comments & clarifications on my often muddled notes. If I have made
any error or omission, please let me know, and I will correct the entry as soon
as possible. Thank you all very much!
When new labels are added (including world-wide
ones), they are added here, at the top of the list, printed in dark green; this saves you having to trawl through the whole lot
to find the new ones. After some time, they are shifted to their correct page
and alphabetical position.
British Labels A - I.
ACO G-15650 A
cheaper label manufactured by Vocalion (Aeolian COmpany); it was
around from about 1922 to 1927. The label is very nice, a kind of ‘inverse design’
of the basic Vocalion label. Earlier issues used the smaller size label
(nominally 3” (7.5cm)) but later the larger (3.5” (8.9cm) size was used, this
illustration being one such. By courtesy of Dave Parsons).
Actuelle 11280 British
Actuelle began about 1920 and finished in 1928. The ‘popular’ catalogue series
began as such at the very ‘binary-looking number’ of 10101; apparently 10100
was a dealer promotion disc. There were about 1,200 issues in this series!
None, of course, could ever be described as common; quite a few of the Jazz
items are only known by one or two copies! Just seeing any Actuelle in a
junk-pile used to ‘make the day’ for us is the days when there were such
things!
Actuelle 11349 A British Actuelle of 1926. The
combination of pink, green and gold filigree makes them hard to scan.
Actuelle 15167 Just
to underline the perversity of this label, here is a British dance band
recording dating from about 1923, but in the 15000 series. The diameter of this
record is 11.25” (28.6cm). Don’t ask me what diameter any other 15000s are:
this is the only one I’ve ever found in nearly 50 years of messing around with
78s!
Aerial B-3
An
incredible rarity. Akin to the first thin unbreakable Duophones of 1927 (see
below), these were produced by that same company; but who for, or where they
were to be sold, is unknown. Only a handful are known. By courtesy of Arthur
Badrock. On
Aerona
187 These
were manufactured for sale in
Albion
1112B Gramophone
Boom.
Apollo
20 Gramophone
Boom
Ariel K-312 Gramophone
Boom. A different series to those shown below. By courtesy of Dr.
Rainer Lotz.
Ariel 40337 Gramophone
Boom. Sold by
Ariel
14423 Gramophone
Boom. A smaller size label of a good cakewalk tune.
Ariel 337 Here’s
an amazing Ariel! I’ve seen scores – probably hundreds – of Ariels over the
past forty-odd years. ALL of them had brown labels with gold printing,
substantially the same label design. They were around from maybe 1912 to 1937.
But here is a BLUE Ariel, with a different sort of label. The title indicates
that it belongs to c. 1919. It looks as though it’s pasted over something else…
A great oddity. By courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz.
Ariel 3557 I
had not been sure that Ariel continued through the 1914-18 War, but this record
seemed to prove it. By this issue, they were being produced for
Ariel Z4494 Also
issued on a Parlophone R500 series, this roughly 1930 Ariel bears masters
recorded in
Ariel
4392 There
are already a lot of Ariel labels up here, but what the heck. This is the Joe
Venuti OKeh, and as they were produced by
Arrow A-53 Gramophone
Boom. On
Arrow A-137
Gramophone
Boom. A different colour to the scan already here.
Beatall
373 Gramophone
Boom.
Beka 48 Gramophone
Boom.
Beka Grand 676 The Gramophone Boom. The
German company Beka ended up being established in
Beka Grand 708 The Gramophone Boom. This Beka,
contrary to 676 shown nearby, claims to be of All British manufacture. True?
Who knows! By courtesy of Dave Parsons. On
Belcanto
5131 Gramophone
Boom.
Belcanto 5326 Gramophone
Boom. It’s the same design, but one can’t really have too many of these
beautiful labels, can one?
Bell
Disc 6 This
is an Edison Bell product, not a German stencil. C.1910
Bell
Disc 233 This
one is later: green with gold lettering.
Bell
Disc 488 By
courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz.
Beltona 120 This
is the very rare ‘first incarnation’ of the Beltona label, William Dean-Myatt
has kindly provided the following details as well as this scan. (Incidentally I
would mention here that one of Bill’s major discographical projects has been on
the Beltona label – which has an unusually complex history. See his website for
more details: www.beltonaproject.co.uk ) Bill only knows of
three examples of this label:
“THE
113 3038 Whispering
3041 You Made Me Happy For A While
(Both
these sides are on Popular P-1114)
“STAR”
HARMONISERS (as shown here)
120 3078
I’d
Love To Fall Asleep And Wake Up In My Mammy’s Arms
(Both
these sides are on Popular P-1135 as ‘Premier Hamonists’)
BILLY
WHITLOCK, xylophone or bells
150 728x On
The
614x Fairy Kisses
Side
1 from Aco G-15090 (C-325) via Guardsman 575 (as Fred White)
Side
2 from Aco G-15106 (C-338) via Guardsman 664 (as Fred White)
Bill
goes on to say: “I think the material on the first two records was made about
1920/21, whilst the material on the third was recorded about 1915/16 (I don’t
know much about dating these). As I said, after the most extensive research
into the Beltona label (I’ve reconstructed the entire catalog of some 3000 x
78s) I still can’t find out anything about what market these Beltonas were
intended for. With one turning up in
Beltona 666 Like
Coliseum, this was a Vocalion-produced label. It began at 101 around 1922 but
then has a red-and-cream colour scheme. These colours were soon abandoned, and the
‘familiar’ greeny label appeared. I put ‘familiar’ in quotes because much as we
would like to keep finding Beltona records, they are consistently scarce! Later
in the 1920s the label passed from the
Beltona 1541 When labels are unusual – or
simply look very nice! – we can’t resist having more than one example, so here
is another gorgeous red, gold and white label from the period when Beltona were
pressed by Edison Bell. Circa 1931. By courtesy of Danny Letham. On
Beltona
1607 This
isn’t your ‘common-or-garden’ Beltona; not at all; it’s from a very rare period
around 1931 when Beltona records were produced by Edison Bell., and producing
solely Scottish material (which it continued to do for at least another 25
years…) This record would have – indeed has had – collectors of very
rare British Dance Bands drooling! You almost never see Beltona records with
catalogue numbers over 1,000! On
Beltona 1761 A label re-design, and a much
smaller size of label, as the centre hole shows. But still, I think, in the
Edison Bell Period. By courtesy of Danny Letham. On
Beltona 1841 Another similar one. By
courtesy of Danny Letham. On
Beltona 2111 For all that these Scottish
records are hard to find, they certainly kept up a good flow of issues: the
catalogue numbers are marching on quite quickly. This one may now be from the
early part of the Decca period. Decca took over Edison Bell in 1933. By
courtesy of Danny Letham. On
Beltona BL-2396 Now a BL- prefix has arrived, and
quite a large jump in time… The copyright legend includes a reference to
‘copying’; this wording did not appear, I believe, until after 1945. Before
then, the ability – of the general public at any rate - to copy records was virtually unknown. By
courtesy of Danny Letham. On
Beltona BL-6184-b Danny Letham kindly sent both sides of this
disc as they are printed in different colours, and only the ‘B’ side actually
carries the suffix! Decca master numbers at around DR-12100 would indicate a
date of ~1948. This ‘new’ 6000 series was presumably reserved for Scottish
Country Dance material. By courtesy of Danny Letham. On
On
If you have any Beltona records, and would like to
help William Dean-Myatt with his project, please check out Bills’ website!
There, apart from much more information on this fascinating label, you’ll find
a list of Beltona numbers for which Bill still needs some information. If you
have any of these, even just one, please email Bill with the details he
requires. Many thanks! Email Bill via: www.beltonaproject.co.uk
Besttone 167 Gramophone Boom. What is the
significance of ‘Rifanco Brand’ and ‘Marble Brand’? Another of these inscrutable
1910-1914 labels. It’s rare though; I’ve never found one after nearly 50 years.
Beta 360 These
were made (rather obviously) for export to
Bob 288 “A
rare Scots label from before 1914. George “Pamby” Dick (1864-1942) of
Bouwmeester 474 Dating
from about 1923, this British made record was presumably made for sale in the
BRC B-146 This
is a new label to us. It has the ‘look of the early 1930s’ and of British
Homophone… can anyone help with more info., please? By courtesy of Mike Jones. On
R-3450 I promise you B.R.C. B-103
R-3451
I have eyes
B.R.C. B-103
This comes from Rex 9529 recorded 3rd.
April 1939. Also, Steven Walker kindly commented that this was by far the
highest catalogue number he had ever seen. And that, as usual, very obscure
labels, thought only to have existed briefly, can still surprise us by
producing catalogue numbers far beyond those we expected! Anyhow, I was way out
in my estimate of early 30s… (NF).
Britannic 5372 This is the proud precursor of
the other style of Britannic as shown below. By courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz.
Britannic
2330 Gramophone
Boom.
Britannic
115 Gramophone
Boom.
Britannic 1212 Gramophone
Boom. I left the original bad scan here because the implication is, that if
there were catalogue numbers like 115, 1212 and 2330 in use on what is
essentially the same label, are we to believe that over TWO THOUSAND THREE
HUNDRED Britannic records were issued in their own short period? This cannot
possibly be the case, surely. More likely is that blocks of numbers were used
for different kinds of repertoire.
Brunswick 2438 This
will be a ‘short survey’ of
Brunswick 3215 This
is the second type of Brunswick Cliftophone label. The origin of the word Cliftophone
is not known to me. John Hobbs of
Brunswick 15061 All
through the 1920s
Brunswick 3039 There
eventually appeared the ‘shield’ label, which in
Brunswick 147 Hitherto,
all issues on British Brunswick were of American origin. However, the
redoubtable Fred Elizalde made practically all his important records for
Brunswick, and the modestly-numbered ‘100’ series contains many superb gems by
this much-neglected musician. Note that the star visiting Americans are
credited on the label; possibly Brunswick copied this from Parlophone. In any
event, fairly consistent label credits to band members seems to me to have
originated in Britain. 1928.
Brunswick 1068 Brunswick
fell apart here (probably more than once), but was re-floated and began again
at 1000. We now have 4 scans of the same record (Duke Ellington’s ‘Mood
Indigo’) which we will also use as an illustration of the appearance of the ‘O’
prefix, which has occasionally given rise to confusion. This label is an early
pressing: the catalogue number appears at the bottom of the label, where it
always had done with the shield label. This is ‘Mood Indigo’ with its original
titling.
Brunswick 1068 Off
at a tangent, the pressing is later: the catalogue number is to the right of
the centre-hole. Moreover, the band credit has been made correct. However, the
song still retains it old title! (Sorry that this label and the next are in
black and white… I photographed them many years ago using 35mm orthochromatic
film, when the luxury of scanners – let alone computers! – was but a wild
fantasy!)
Brunswick
1068 Aha!
Now, both band and tune have the correct title!
Brunswick 1068 Finally,
on a horribly-printed (and ineptly-scanned!) post-WW2 label, the issue with the
‘O’ prefix. Well, from 1931 the issues had come thick and fast, and the 1000
series notched itself up quickly. By April 1933 it had already reached 1499.
(This information by courtesy of Malcolm Rockwell, via the 78-list). At this
time Brunswick became part of Decca and an ‘O’ prefix was then adopted. Whether
this was the letter O or the figure 0 (zero) is known, but I’ve
forgotten which it is. (I am reminded of what used to be a standard British
Data Book on valves (tubes), which remarked forlornly in its preface: ‘Often,
with valve types that begin with O or 0, it is not possible to determine which
is intended... therefore all are listed together....’) Anyhow, when records
prior to 1500 were listed in the catalogue, and hopefully, orders for them
flooded in requiring re-pressings, the O was retrospectively added. Thinking
about it, this must remain a fairly unusual occurrence for a record label.
There must be many instances where there is actually no record such as, say,
O1303. If nobody bought any more after the first run and it was never
re-pressed, there actually exist only copies of Brunswick 1303, assuming, of
course, that there are any copies of it left at all. Accordingly, as Brian Rust
always lists British Brunswick 1000-onwards with an ‘O’ prefix (doubtless
to help distinguish them from the many other (and, alas, frequently much
better-pressed) sorts of Brunswick), he is quite possibly listing records that
do not exist. (However, nobody in their right mind would complain at this
exceedingly trivial infraction: after all, without Rust, lots of us would know
far less about 78s that we do!) Oh: the labels scans! Sorry; I was starting to
drift off into rambling…
Brunswick 1234 Just
to show another illustration of O and non-O records, consider these two. The
first is exceedingly rare, and I count myself lucky to own it. Moreover, this
very copy of it was claimed by its vendor (to whom I would entrust my life), as
having once been the property of Jack Hylton. Greatly as I admire the work of
Jack Hylton down the decades, I find it difficult to detect much of the
influence of Jimmie Noone in his music. Perhaps the relevant sides remain
unissued.... Anyhow, if somebody will show me a copy of this one labelled
O1234, I will buy them several pints of best bitter.
Brunswick 1235 While
right next door, so to speak, is a record that survived all vicissitudes and
was deservedly re-pressed many times until the 1950s, which is when I bought it
new ‘over the counter’. Hence such records bear their endorsement of ‘O’ as a
badge of Long Service!
Brunswick RL283 In
the meantime, Brunswick had become part of Decca, (a cheap label buying up an expensive
one (Brunswick had always sold at top-price) a reversal of former
procedures…) But, in the face of the mid-1930s depression, and probably in the
wake of EMI introducing the cheaper HMV BD series, the Columbia FB series and
the Parlophone F series, Decca introduced (gasp!) a cheap Brunswick
record! Like those series named above, it had a red-based label but unlike the
deep red-maroon of HMV or the plum of the FB and F series, the cheap Brunswick
had a defiant sort of scarlet red colour. In the event, it might as well have
been chartreuse or eau-de-nil, because they are really very hard to find! There
is even the fabulous ‘accidental issue’ of a Ted Lewis master on RL Brunswick,
that was rejected because of a fantastic ‘wow’ fault on the master. Somehow, we
understand, it slipped out over here on RL Brunswick, so the fanatical Ted
Lewis collectors are compelled to search for this abomination, of which
probably only a few dozen copies were ever pressed, but which still counts as
‘an issue’!
Brunswick 02200 The
shield label held sway well into the 1950s. Indeed, I am reliably informed that
early pressings of Bill Haley’s ‘Rock Around The Clock’ actually appeared on
the shield label, though I have never seen one. I have, of course, seen many
dozens of copies of that record on the ‘modernised’ Brunswick label… But I
choose to illustrate that last Brunswick popular series label with an ‘out-of
period’ record. Namely, King Oliver’s Creole Jazz Band’s ‘Dipper Mouth Blues’
from Gennett, recorded in 1923 and dubbed by American Decca and issued here in
the mid-1930s. It was still available virtually up to the end of 78s in this
country. Not a bad life-span for a record! (See an advert for this set in the
entry for Brunswick 02501 below.)
Brunswick 02501 1936
was a pivotal year for the enthusiasts of Classic Jazz. Various important
articles appeared in magazines; the book ‘Rhythm On Record’ – the first attempt
at a Dance/Jazz discography in Britain – appeared. In the U.S.A. Victor issued
the superb 7-disc Bix Beiderbecke Memorial Album. Decca got its American
counterpart to find and transfer early Gennett recordings by King Oliver, The
New Orleans Rhythm Kings and The Wolverines. These were issued only in Britain
in the first instance. Click here to see an advert. for them from
‘Rhythm On Record’. These reissues were extremely
successful, and Brunswick carried on with an album ‘21 Years of Swing
Music’. This scan is one of the discs from that album, which bears yet another
Wolverines side.
Bull Dog 505 Great
War period. Hard to date in the absence of lists, we often have to fall
back on the repertoire for clues. Even this is of little help if it’s standard
material, e.g. Mendelssohn’s ‘Spring Song’! But popular songs can be useful,
provided we know their dates. Alas, ‘Frisky Old Herbert’, as sung by Billy
Whitlock on this particular ‘incarnation’ of Bull Dog (there are at least
three..) is not much help. Perhaps a clue lies in the colour of the paper used
for the label! Check this one, then compare with this Lyceum
record. Just maybe they were produced in the same factory around the same
time? We still don’t really know when that time was, though. But often tiny clues
like this will give us an insight as to how to proceed with our investigations,
just as archaeologists use potsherds and coins to date sites. By courtesy of
Dr. Rainer Lotz.
Bull Dog 513 Just post-Gramophone Boom British
label, during WW1. By courtesy of Arthur Badrock.
Bull Dog 528 Strangely,
Bulldog seems to have suddenly abandoned the use of paper labels. Certainly,
during the Great War economies in the printing of labels was practiced. To
abandon the label altogether, then, was a stroke of inspiration! One cannot
help admire the patient work of the engraver. Surely he didn’t work on the wax
master itself; he must have use a combination of stamps, cast impressions and
so on. I have never seen any writings on how this sort of ‘label’ was
made.
Bull Dog 583 Here is an etched ‘label’, but
this time infilled in white instead of red, as seen elsewhere. By courtesy
of Arthur Badrock.
Bull Dog 631 Bright and cheerful is this
label in orange and dark blue. Perhaps this represents the end of the Great
War? Composer Melville Gideon came over as pianist with the American Ragtime
Octette before the War. By courtesy of Arthur Badrock.
Bull Dog 672 We are actually into circa
1920 here. The label has become a drab green and grey. Bull Dog is fascinating
because it is one of the minor labels that seem to have run through the 1914-18
war period, and survived for some time afterwards. Therefore it is an important label for the transitional
period of ragtime into Jazz, 1918 – 1920. A complete listing of Bull Dogs,
especially towards the end, would be very interesting indeed! By courtesy of
Arthur Badrock.
Butterfly P-299 We’re
back into the 1912 ‘Gramophone Boom’ era with this one, which is a ‘Popular’
record, not-very-subtly disguised by the over-stuck Butterfly label. I once saw
this same ‘Butterfly’ sticker over an early 1920s blue Imperial label. It’s
hard to guess what ‘Registered – Express – Reserve Stock’ actually means, but
it definitely sounds impressive! I imagine somebody just bought up remainder
records and stuck the Butterfly stickers on them. But if my Imperial was a
‘proper’ Butterfly record, then the Butterfly guy was active for around 10
years; we can only hope he at least made a few quid! By the way, I found this
Butterfly record on Phil Pospychala’s stall at his Centenary ‘Bix Bash’ at
Racine, Wisconsin, U.S.A., in late February 2003. I wondered how this piece of
British discographical incunabula might have got to North America, and
asked on the 78-list. It turned out that Malcolm Shaw had found a couple of
this sort of Butterfly records in Wyoming, and someone else knew of one that
turned up even further west, in Washington State if I remember correctly!
Amazing. There are other ‘Populars’ in their right place on this page. Like
Bull Dog, that label survived, vaguely anachronistic, until about 1922 or even
1923…
Celebrity 4390 An
extremely rare British label, circa 1930. I have only ever seen one of these.
They seem to have drawn from Dominion (q.v.) masters. A major find, one
of these! It is rumoured that certain Len Fillis Hawaiian sides with vocals by
Al. Bowlly only appeared on Celebrity. Alas! for Bowlly
collectors; you have our deepest sympathy! By courtesy of Mike Hart.
Champion G140 Gramophone Boom. A Label of
Gamage’s – a famous department store in London. Later they had a label just
called Gamage – see below.
Chappell
12 By
courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz.
Chappell
16 Gramophone
Boom.
Chappell
B3 Gramophone
Boom.
Cinch 5090 A
product of the Gramophone Co (i.e. H.M.V.), in reaction to the floods of low-price
records. This one seems to use an existing Zonophone master, but they recorded
hundreds of new sides to launch Cinch. C.1913.
Cinecord 014 This
short-lived label dates from the early mid-1930s. Though the discs were 10” in
size, the labels were quite small. I believe they were produced by British
Homophone.
Clarion 108 This
was a British Cylinder company. They produced both vertical and lateral cut
discs. It is believed they continued to produce 2-minute cylinders as late as
1923!
Clarion 135 Clarion
was a cylinder company, who sensibly diversified into discs, using at first the
phono cut & then going on to lateral cut. The lovely labels of their discs
were an adaptation of the design of their cylinder boxes. Come to think of it,
was that a ‘first’ for Clarion? At any rate, the discs soon folded, and Clarion
discs to this day must be far outweighed by the number of Clarion cylinders
that still exist in collections. By courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz. On 9th
August 2006, William Dean-Myatt kindly commented: I think the masters for these
emanated with Popular/Grammavox.
Coliseum
430b Gramophone
Boom.
Coliseum 386 The Gramophone Boom. Alas,
green and gold labels are hard to scan: this should be a dark green.
Coliseum 1847 Coliseum
was a label that began pre-WW1, and was revived in the early 1920s. It was then
produced by the Vocalion group, and is thus allied to 1920s ACO, Guardsman,
Homochord, Beltona etc. They existed in this form between about 1922 and 1928.
This master, because the label has a G. series (control number), is probably
from American Vocalion. By courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz.
Coliseum 1992 Not
long before the label vanished, it underwent a colour change as shown here.
From 2 shades of blue it went to a sort of russet and pink. Very nice, but it
didn’t stop the label going away. These of course were lovely records to find
in the 50s & 60s, because then nobody had sorted out properly what was on
them, and you might find an Original Memphis Five, or even a Fletcher
Henderson! (I never did, though!) The C-###-E format of the master indicates a
British Vocalion Electrical recording. (The acoustic series C- prefix was
‘vested’in ACO, and ran to around C-8000 before beginning again at C-1-E in
August 1926).
Columbia Test Black
label and green label American Columbia discs were imported into this country
before they were pressed here. This test label is of that early period.
C.1905-6. By courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz.
Columbia 1242 As
yet, we have not attempted to systematically document the Columbia label in
Britain. Here are couple of early-ish discs, which may form the nucleus of a
complete set. Though this and the following disc are numbered consecutively,
they have different labels. The early history of Columbia in Britain is fairly
complex – I for one freely admit I have little grasp of it – but it involved
Columbia apparently ‘retrogressing’ into Rena records, then re-emerging. 1241
is a Rena ‘Double Face’ record, while 1242 is a ‘Columbia-Rena’ record. The one
thing I do know, is that this so-called 4-part minstrel show is a fake! It is
nothing but a re-hash of four earlier single sided records. Otherwise, there
would not be the announcement: ‘Gentlemen! The Introductory Overture!’ on each
side. They appeared about 1910. Still, I was very pleased to find these discs
in fine condition, as some of them seem to date to as early as 1903.
Columbia CB-72 Many
labels carried on into the Depression just as before, hoping it would soon end.
Columbia in particular continued to produce beautifully pressed, well recorded
discs. This is a smaller label, and dates from 1930-1; it’s also from the time
when they indicated the tempo of the record. 42 bars per minute in this case.
Columbia D-7379 An Austrian issue probably from
around 1910-12. By courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz.
Columbia DH-32 This design of label (the frame
shape, that it…) started during WW1 and was retained afterwards until about
1920-21 in the U.K. There aren’t many ‘Christmas label’ discs, come to think
about it. By courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz.
Columbia U-101 A kind of ‘custom pressing’ for a music store or supply
company in the Netherlands. I’d guess a date of ~1911 for this. By courtesy
of Dr. Rainer Lotz. On 29th June 2004 Al Simmons kindly commented: …sez in
Dutch...... Distributed by the Netherlands Association of Musical Instrument
Dealers Association Record (Bond Plaat)
(Dutch Bond not like German Bund) "Old Dutch Childrens Songs"
Columbia A
demonstration disc made at the time of the re-launch of the Savoy Orpheans,
about 1931. By courtesy of Dave Parsons.
Columbia 5282 A standard British Columbia of
1927. Len Fillis was a South African who played banjo, guitar and Hawaiian
guitar. He was considered to be ‘the man’ for ‘hot’ bands, and played for some
time with Fred Elizalde and his Orchestra at the Savoy Hotel in 1928. (Please, NOT
Fred Elizalde’s Anglo-American orchestra: that, while being a description
of it (to some extent) was not what it was actually called).
Columbia 9572 This is the standard 12” (30cm)
Columbia series for most of the 1920s. The superb concert arrangement of ‘Sweet
Sue’ by Paul Whiteman, which features a Bix Beiderbecke cornet solo of awesome
poise and authority did not, unfortunately, sell well here. Indeed, this copy
of the British disc was evidently exported to, and sold in, France, as the
copyright stamp attests.
Columbia S-10003 In late 1949 and early 1950, a series
of about 14 Japanese Columbias were issued, headlined: ‘History Of Jazz’. The
reverse of this Bix Beiderbecke item is ‘Potato Head Blues’ by Louis
Armstrong’s Hot Seven. A magnificent coupling, if ever there was one! Unfortunately,
both sides are dubbed – rather fuzzily – and the material in which the record
is pressed is rather noisy, so the disc is more of an interesting curio than a
Prime Source of these sides. (Info. courtesy of Julian Vein).
Columbia 19009 Made
in Britain for export, obviously…. But not sure to where! Looks circa
1929. On 1st April 2004 Kevin Yandell told us that this side also appeared
on Australian Columbia 0774.
Columbia D-15552 Ah! Now you tell us, please, where this
label comes from? Hungary, maybe? I wonder what the ‘Splendid Jazz Band’
sounded like! Dating these exotic labels is a dangerous business: it looks very
1927 to me, but that’s only in relation to a British Columbia! By courtesy
of Dr. Rainer Lotz. On 15th November 2002 Mike Harkin of Plovdiv agreed that
this appeared to be a Hungarian issue. He has dated the master (H-1459)
provisionally to Jan – July 1927, using Peter Copeland’s dating guide (which is
a new work to me! Sounds great!)
Columbia D-34022 Ditto….but more like 1929! By courtesy
of Dr. Rainer Lotz. Again, on 15th November 2002, Mike Harkin of Plovdiv
offered to date this master: Mike thinks it’s Vietnamese, and states that if
so, the highest master number in Peter Copeland’s work is 64683, Dec 1928. The
master of this side, however, at 64734, must be a little later…
Columbia D-6230(b) Here’s a coupling of the French and Belgian
National Anthems… but it’s strange to me in that the label design looks very
1930s, but the label clearly states ‘Speed 80’; can anybody date and place the
L300 series masters? By courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz. On 15th November 20002,
Mike Harkin of Plovdiv kindly quoted a recording date of January to July 1927
for this item, which would accord with the 80 rpm speed, while this issue (or
pressing) is indeed some years later.
Columbia DB-1351 Here’s an interesting later Layton &
Johnstone record. It’s presumably been broadcast from Radio Lyons; one of the
French commercial stations that transmitted sponsored programmes intended for
reception in Britain. Preservene is – or was – a brand of soap. The date looks
like 8-9-37…
Columbia DB-1883 This is the normal, standard British
Columbia label for issues from the mid-1930s to nearly the end of 78s. Except
that in this example, the Western Brothers have the singular distinction
(afforded to hardly anybody else) of their own ‘logo’ (a school or college tie)
superimposed on the label. The record is evidently concerned with the
shortcomings of William Joyce, an Irish-American Nazi sympathiser who made
propaganda broadcasts in English from Germany during WW2. He was colloquially
known here as ‘Lord Haw Haw’. (I understand that when captured at the end of
the War by American forces he was handed over to us. He was charged with High
Treason, found guilty and executed by the British Military Authorities.
Although he was not actually a British citizen, he nevertheless fell under
British jurisdiction on the grounds that he had enlisted in the British Army at
an early age, & was therefore still bound by the Oath of Loyalty to the
British Crown he would have taken at that time). By courtesy of Dr. Rainer
Lotz. Bill Myatt commented on 24-04-03: The Western Brothers, Kenneth &
George, were actually cousins. Both sang, but Kenneth played the piano.
Columbia DB3267 By way of contrast, the accession of
Queen Elizabeth II in 1952 called forth many commemorative labels, just as
British royalty had always periodically done. I imagine this one co-ordinated
with her coronation, June 2nd (as far as I recall…) 1953. By courtesy of Dr.
Rainer Lotz.
Columbia DC-435 Circa
1940s. These DC series are relatively common here as there were some Jazz
issues that were sought out by collectors. William Dean-Myatt says that you
could get any export item to special order through your local EMI agent.
Of course, you first had to know that it existed! Certainly, DC Columbias were
obtained, and HMV B-4800s, JF-, JO- series turn up with some frequency, but not,
by any means, all of them! E.g. the Charlie Johnson, and the
master pressings of Morton’s ‘Tank Town Bump’ and ‘Steamboat Stomp’ (plus many
others) are in the hen’s teeth class! The regular HMV B- series used dubbings
of these! On 15th November 2002, Mike Harkin of Plovdiv commented: “Columbia
DC.435 -- WERM sez "British, for export" on its label/numbering
schematic. Prob for Spanish or Latin American market; Augustin Lara is
Mexican or Argentinian, IIRC.” On 27th April 2003, Bill Dean-Myatt kindly added:
Augustin Lara (1897-1970) played piano and sang, and was Mexican. Eva Garza,
vocal, died 1966 and was also Mexican. The record was made in New York,
1946/47.
Columbia DF-684 As
far as I know, this is a normal French issue, but manufactured over here for
some reason. Perhaps because it’s ‘Little Red Riding Hood’, and used for
educational purposes? A leaflet with the text accompanies this disc. It has a
large label, but with the 1940s ‘rational’ face for the catalogue number. No
idea of date. On 15th November 2002 Mike Harkin of Plovdiv kindly supplied a
recording date of ‘the first half of 1931’ for this item. On 28th April 2003
Bill Dean-Myatt confirmed Paris, July 1931.
Columbia EO-425 Somewhere,
in a small office lost among the labyrinth of EMI HQ, there was The Officer Of
Prefixes. At least I will cling to that romantic concept. Where else, for
instance, could one come up with the EO- prefix? Does it actually mean
anything? Pre-EMI Columbia were much given to prefixes using the letter D, for
instance. Did this signify anything, other than, perhaps, innate conservatism;
a fear, possibly, that the promiscuous use of prefix letters would cause, one
day in the future, a drastic shortage of unused letters? Who knows? Indeed, who
cares? Anyhow, in this presumably 1950s label, pressed in the U.K. but sold in
an African colony, Uganda maybe, the EO- prefix served out its probably brief but
hopefully constructive existence. By courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz. On 27th
April 2003 Bill Dean-Myatt kindly informed us that the disc was recorded in
Mombasa (Kenya), September 1945.
Columbia MC-3162 Note that this has DF-2129 in small type
below that catalogue number. Perhaps that is a normal French Columbia catalogue
number. 1940s, I guess.
Columbia RS-550 Large
label but ‘modern’ type face for the catalogue number puts this label in the
mid to late 1940s, maybe later. No idea of intended distribution. On the
14th November 2002 William Dean-Myatt kindly informed us: Columbia RS-550 was
recorded in Barcelona in April 1928. This singer (r.n. Pastora Pavon) is
superb, the best flamenco singer of all, in my opinion. Her records must
have sold really well as they seem reasonably common here in Britain.
Columbia WE-168 More
of the same. Only this time in Tanganyika and Zanzibar. By courtesy of Dr.
Rainer Lotz. On 14th November, William Dean-Myatt kindly informed us: Columbia
WE-168 was recorded on 17th. February 1939, possibly in Kampala.
Columbia LCX-88 I
don’t know anything about this prefix, except that it is obviously part of a
large set, possibly automatically coupled; and I had never seen an ‘LCX-‘
prefix Columbia before this one arrived in my mailbox from Rainer 6 months ago.
(In case anybody reading this doesn’t know about ‘automatic couplings’… These
were made because if you have a long work, spread over say 20 sides, that’s 10
discs, right? So you have to play side 1, then get up and turn the record over and
play side 2, etc., etc. But when auto-changers arrived (late 1920s on…), they
would play six, eight, or even ten records one after the other… but only the
‘A’ side. OK? So, obviously, what you needed was a specially-pressed series of
discs that had side 1 pressed with side 20 on the back, side 2 with side 19 on
the back, then 3/18; 4/17; 5/16; 6/15; 7/14;
8/13; 9/12; 10/11. You see? The stack of 78s would play from side 1 to
side 10, without you having to intervene. Then, you would irritably deposit
your very large gin and tonic on the small table by your armchair, get up just
the once and turn over the entire stack of 10 discs on your autochanger, and
activate ‘Play’. The machine would then obediently play sides 11, 12, 13, etc.,
etc., up to 20! Voila! Simple, eh? It must have been very irritating to the connoisseur
if the mechanism failed (as it sometimes did) and allowed 2 discs to fall
instead of 1. What would you do? Go back to the beginning of the opera? Mess
about splitting the stack of slippery 12” 78s? Ignore the lapse but pour
yourself an extra-generous new gin and tonic? By Jove, the arrival of the CD
has solved any number of problems for the music lover!) Scan by courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz. On
15th November 2002, Mike Harkin of Plovdiv kindly informed us that this would
seem to be a post WW2 series, though all the records he has seen on it comprise
issues of earlier material…. In this case, Mike comments: “This particular one
is from D.15156-73 rec Dec 1928 (PCDG). Also recall Claudia Muzio, Madeleine
Grey and 1927-30 Bayreuth stuff issued thus.” My assumption that this is an
‘automatically coupled series’ may well be wrong, but I’ll leave the
explanation of what automatic coupling actually is in place in case it’s news
to anyone…
Columbia YB6 This
group of 4 scans could well form the basis for a useful article in a Learned
Journal. It (the article) might be called: ‘The Columbia YB Series: Some
Problems in its Conception and Continuation.” Take this first label, for
instance. About the only thing right about it is the ‘Y’ in the prefix. OK, so
the label is yellow. But then it all starts to go wrong. (a) The label
is upside down! But that’s really great, actually! I mean, why should labels
always be the same way up? OK, it’s kinda weird at first, but we could learn to
live with that. But then, (b) It’s got
this ridiculous master prefix, CWA. I mean, once, we thought we knew what these
things meant. ‘W’ meant ‘Western Electric’, royalty payable and all that sort
of thing. By 1930, Columbia had their own system, prefixed (not unreasonably)
‘C’: meaning, ‘We’ve got our own system now and don’t have to pay you the
royalty any more!’ (‘A’ of course is just Columbia’s actual master series at
that time anyhow). So I suppose, just
possibly, this bizarre prefix might involve a dubbing in which a
Columbia-system recording was dubbed onto a Western Electric cutting lathe? Or
vice versa? Finally, (c) we come to the content of the record itself. Fond as I
am of the expression ‘Those were simpler times’, I find it difficult to believe
that even a child in 1929 would believe that this was really a recording of a
steam train. It is obviously a very poor studio imitation of a train. The reverse,
by the way, is entitled: American Train, and is virtually the same except that
the whistle is replaced by a bell. No: the whole record is futile in the
extreme, and, had I not discovered this copy at a record bazaar about a
fortnight ago, I would never have believed in its existence, unless told by
someone in whom I had absolute trust. As you can see, it runs at 78 rpm.
Columbia YBX7 I
mention 78 rpm, because this one runs at 33 rpm. You may say that YBX7 may not
follow YB6; it may be the next record after YBX 6. Why then, I do not argue
with you: does anybody out there have any more of these? ‘X’ of course means a
12” (30cm) record, which would be fine, and this one is in the series of centre-start
33 rpm cinema records, as its label proclaims, and compatible with the 16”
(40cm) 33 rpm discs on which the sound tracks of films were recorded for a
period in the late 1920s and early 1930s. Though dubbed on both sides, the
sound quality of this item is absolutely superb, and is a tribute to the
recording system employed, and the engineers operating it. From the master
number (WAX-D12) you will see that it is a Western Electric recording, a
Columbia master ‘A’, and 12 “ size ‘X’, and evidently the twelfth in the ‘D’
sub-series, which we claim probably stands for ‘Dub’. This is in all ways a
very fine record, and one which may fittingly represent the pinnacle of the YB
series, from the four examples of it which we possess.
Columbia
YB13 The
yellow label has turned to blue, which I suppose is quite in order with this
apparently erratic series, and we’re back to 78 rpm as well. We have a slightly
different master series, too, prefixed WAD. Western Electric, Columbia, Dub. No
problem there. The recording of Big Ben is rather distant, and, though I no
longer have the disc, it’s by no means as atmospheric as the Big Ben record
issued on HMV. However, the HMV deliberately recorded the sound of London
Traffic as well, with motor horns and so on, so that disc would, when played in
distant Colonial Outposts, Refresh and Invigorate the stalwart upholders of the
British Empire. The Columbia was doubtless meant for less exalted purposes,
such as sound effects for theatre and broadcasting use. In that role, it would,
admittedly, have served adequately.
Columbia YB23 By
1937, the gradually mounting public outcry against the pathetic inadequacies of
YB6 had clearly borne fruit. EMI presumably despatched their Recording Van to
places where actual real steam locomotives could be recorded. The results are
generally highly commendable.
Criterion This
is a weird one, circa 1920. (a) There was a paper shortage in Britain at the
end of WW1; at least of the sorts of papers used for record labels – remember,
the paper and inks had to be able to withstand the heat while being pressed.
(b) Whoever it was who had stickers made saying ‘Registered – Express – Reserve
Stock’ (see Butterfly - stuck over Popular - above) also had them made saying
‘Criterion Record’. However, in this case, it is stuck over a blank label, and
the title has been hand-written on the label. This label came from an album of
labels that Tony Houghton compiled many years ago, by simmering the disc in
acetic acid: eventually, the upper label would float off. He stuck them in the
album with double sided sellotape, which seemed all right at the time, but the
gook has finally soaked through the label, accounting for the dark bands you
see on many of the labels, especially early ones, on this page. However, in
this case it was good, because the gook revealed reversed printing underneath.
Accordingly, I removed the label from the album, and tweaking the image….
Criterion
(reverse) …revealed a
Guardsman label underneath. Note that this is not an impression of the
label over which the Criterion ‘label’ was pasted. Were that the case, the
image would of course be reversed. No, this label is actually an unused
Guardsman label that has been used just because it was a round piece of paper
with a hole in it. Who made these things and where they sold them remains
unknown. Even more tantalising, what was the record from which Tony Houghton
removed this label? Was it stuck down over a Popular or something similar? If
so, we would have a record that involved three labels, which is great,
though pretty silly!
Curry
250 This
is an Edison Bell ‘stencil’.
Curry 135 Another
example of this mid-1920s label, made for the cycle-shop chain, by Crystalate. By
Courtesy of Dave Parsons.
Curry 200 Currys
(already a well-known chain of cycle shops) had records produced for them by
different companies, both pre-1914 and later. This example is derived from the
Piccadilly label, circa early 1929. It bears the same catalogue number.
The Curry label is pasted over the Piccadilly. Curry’s still exists as an
important chain of domestic electrical and audio retail supermarkets.
Curry 317 Despite
its later number, this record is earlier, and produced by Imperial. The tune
indicates a date of 1927.
Curwen This
label is dealt with as part of an inter-related ‘family’ of labels; all ten
appear grouped together at the bottom of the J - Z label page.
Dacapo 322 Gramophone
Boom. This label should be dark green. On
9th August 2006, William Dean-Myatt kindly commented: This was issued February
1912. (from Frank Andrews).
Decca F-2978 A special Decca label of 1932,
issued in connection with the Eucharistic Conference in Dublin.
Decca M-70 Decca
started out with the cheap F- series, selling at 1/6d (7.5p) in 1929. Soon they
introduced the ‘up-market’ M series. This is a white label review copy. Decca
must have distributed them very generously, as they turn up fairly
often. There are of course a good many fine Ambrose records on M- series Decca,
but most of them are hard-to-find; so having a few ‘promo.’ copies floating
around is a bonus! By courtesy of Dave Parsons.
Decca M-94 Although
British Decca began as a cheap label, they almost immediately began to make
more ambitious, exalted recordings. This ca.1930 version of Walton’s
‘Portsmouth Point’ overture is quite exhilarating. On 9th August 2006, William Dean-Myatt kindly commented: Recorded 11th.
October 1929.
Decca MW-198 During WW2, Decca issues a
series of records for background music purposes, playing in factories and so
on, when it had been noticed (to the eventual chronic frustration of many of
us!) that suitable music played in the background helped people to work more
efficiently. It was obviously inspired by the regular BBC radio programme
called ‘Music While You Work’: but whether there was a formal connection
between the BBC and this Decca series s not known to us. On balance, I’d say
probably not, as the BBC tended to use EMI as their ‘record company when they
needed one.
Decca PO-5019 The
Decca Polydor series. Presumably 5019 is a Polydor catalogue number? Kristjan
Saag of the 78-list stated that the arrangement began in 1932. This disc, or at
least its label, looks late 1930s.
Diploma A14 Gramophone
Boom. On 9th August 2006, William
Dean-Myatt kindly commented: These came from 10¼" Bell Discs. The Catalogue prefix indicated the type of
material. A were bands, B were 'serious'
singers, C were comic songs, D were instrumental solos, E were 'serious songs',
F were serious duets or vocal groups, G were comedy sketches (from Frank
Andrews).
Diploma C-119 The Gramophone Boom. Normally,
the Diploma record had an ‘ordinary’ label as shown nearby. This special flag
design might be associated with the Coronation of King George V, which was in
1911. By courtesy of Dave Parsons.
Dominion A174 Introduced
in association with the American company Cameo, autumn 1928, Dominion records,
though manifestly a ‘cheap and cheerful’ label, sold fairly well for some time.
This issue was recorded by Jay Wilbur in July 1929. His name was also sometimes
used for issues stemming from American labels.
Dominion C-307 This
is one of the ‘other’ series of Dominion discs, as listed by Arthur Badrock. Of
course this Williams – Waller ‘My Man O’ War’ is a very unusual example of the
later sort of ‘double entendre’ song to be recorded in Britain at this time.
Duophone B5090 This
is, I believe, the earliest manifestation (of three) of the Duophone record,
and it began as a company who made a novel form of gramophone. As you can see
from the picture on the label, it had two sound-boxes, and as one had a longer
linkage than the other, the audio frequencies were meant to be divided between
the two, each of which had its own tone arm. An early form of mechanical
‘cross-over network’ in fact! The discs, in this manifestation, were made by
Vocalion, circa 1925.
Duophone UB-2043 This is the second incarnation of Duophone.
These were thin, relatively indestructible pressings; but as usual, there were
problems, in that the surface noise was pretty high. Of course, it may have
been less when they were first pressed, but I wasn’t around in 1926 to see.
Over time, the actual surface has often acquired a craquelure that would
look marvellous on an Old Master painting, but sounds absolutely awful when
played back with a modern pick-up! Brian Rust has related that sometimes, the needle
in a heavy sound-box would act as a ‘parting tool’, and cut down through the
bottom of the groove. If this catastrophic event occurred, a thin ‘turning’
consisting of two neighbouring groove walls separated by the ridge in between
was produced, and would spiral off the disc. The record would still actually
play, but in the process, produce several hundred feet of black swarf, leaving
only the white cardboard foundation of the disc. This incipient ‘sacrificial’
tendency cannot have been appreciated by the people who bought them. Thus, they
are fairly rare.
Duophone UB-2127 Yet quite a few issues were made…. This one
has a commendable hot trumpet solo.
Duophone D-4005 A
fresh incarnation was clearly called for: a much thicker disc was used (though
still with a ‘paper’ centre) and initially most material was secured from
American Brunswick. This disc is in fact by the Paul Specht band. The series by
the ‘Wabash Dance Orchestra’ has always been sought after by U.S. collectors
interested in Red Nichols; he and other important colleagues were present on
these sides. These records too were moderately indestructible, and the surface
noise was much lower than their predecessors. It seems that all these
black-label indestructible Duophones were issued first, and then some - but not all – were re-pressed….
Duophone D-4034 …in
a conventional shellac material. So the higher-numbered black Duophones
are not to be found in this violet shellac series. Another naughty thing that
Duophone did was to re-use catalogue numbers! This is of course the
discographer’s ‘nightmare scenario’, as, in the absence of company files, one
can never be sure that one has found all the issues!
Duophone D-522 Besides
the D-4000 series (which I believe consists entirely of U.S. Brunswick material
and which is by far the commonest series found), there was a series of local
recordings. Pete Mandell, the American banjoist with the Savoy Orpheans, made
his ‘Take Your Pick’ tenor banjo solo for Duophone in the D-500 series, which
must have sold really quite well, as I have had 3 copies of it over the years.
Zaidee Jackson, too, recorded spiritual numbers. Here is a piano solo of Billy
Mayerl’s best-known composition; I have no idea who W. Harris is, though. Courtesy
of Dave Parsons.
Durium Allied
to the American label ‘Hit Of The Week’ these were pressed on one side only of
a stiff card laminated with a layer of plastic material. They were hence light
and fairly unbreakable. They appeared around 1931. There is an excellent
website, with many images, run by the enthusiast Hans Koert, devoted to this
and other similar flexible discs, e.g. Goodson, Filmophone. Just click here: http://www.people.zeelandnet.nl/koerthchkz
Eclipse 358 Gramophone
Boom.
Eclipse 58 A
Woolworth’s 8” (20cm) ‘store’ label, following on from Victory (see below).
This black overprinting was soon abandoned for this standard design, which
remained in force for the main series until 1935. They issued around a thousand
different records in about five years, and they are still seen around all over
the place at record bazaars today, just like batches of them used to turn up in
junk shops years ago. For some reason, Eclipse is absolutely the ‘King of the
alternative take’ in this country, and alternates are almost the rule rather
than the exception! Besides, they would often re-record sides, with different
vocalists and a different arrangement. An example: I like the tune ‘Time On My
Hands’ and have had the dance band Eclipse for many years. Recently I saw what
I thought was a better condition copy and bought it. It turned out to be a
totally different version, recorded a month later, with a banjo instead of a
guitar, plus an accordeon, but omitting the really nice verse, which was
present on the earlier version. A discographer’s paradise! (Covered very well
by the late Sandy Forbes in ‘BDB’, of course!)
Eclipse SC10 If
you sell all your records at 2.5 pence (as Woolworth’s did), you can hardly
have a ‘Celebrity’ series. But Eclipse did run a blue-label ‘SC’ series. It was
thought that might signify ‘SaCred’, as there are numbers of popular hymns on
the SC series… but I also have a banjo solo on blue label, so that theory falls
rather flat!
Edison
Bell 6271 This
series of Edison Bell was made for sale in The Netherlands. It would date from
about 1923 or 1924, and the side illustrated is pressed from a Gennett master. By
courtesy of Leo Van Der Splinter.
Edison Bell Electron 0183 Though the Edison Bell company
made its bread and butter from cheap mass market records, it always aspired to
better things. They made an ambitious recording of Sir Edward Elgar’s ‘The
Dream Of Gerontius’ for example. The ‘Electron’ label appeared in 1927, and was
evidently meant to be an up-market version of Winner. In practice, although the
surfaces are rather better than the usual Winners, and there are a number of
remarkable issues (e.g. the 14 sides recorded by Chas. Remues New Stompers, a
top-notch Belgian ‘Hot’ Band who were brought over specially to record for
Electron), their comparative rarity is in itself eloquent of its failure.
Electron Test The
‘up-market’ end of the Edison Bell concern in the mid-late 1920s was their
‘Electron’ label (as opposed to the ‘cheap and cheerful’ Winner). Here is an
undoubtedly rare test pressing of one of their bands, noted on the label quite
laconically as ‘Carlton Hotel Band’. The actual issue, on EBE O170 (I don’t
know whether it’s a letter ‘O’ or the digit ‘0’) was as Leslie Norman and his
Carlton Hotel Band. By the way, there are 2 tunes in this period called
‘Sweetness’; this is the first one; the other appeared a couple of years later,
and for once, the Rust/Forbes ‘British Dance Bands’ discography hasn’t
differentiated between them. However, this one, being the first, obviously has
primacy in the claim to its title! Courtesy of Dave Parsons.
Edison Bell Winner 2255 This set of 13 scans will give you an idea of the
life of Edison Bell Winner from its appearance in 1912, to its protracted – but
unavoidable – démise in early 1935. Thanks to Karlo Adrian and Arthur
Badrock’s excellent Edison Bell Winner listing, published by Ernie Bayly, we
can give you the release date of all these discs. This one was issued in
January 1913. Winner was of course established at a time when the British
market was dominated by the labels produced by several large German
manufacturers, and the ‘stencil’ labels derived from them. Hundreds altogether!
The labels were brightly coloured and the records sold well. Courtesy of Dr.
Rainer Lotz.
Edison Bell Winner 2285 Here, thanks to the generosity of Rainer Lotz, who
provided this scan, is the first known label variation of Winner. The horse now
gallops partly towards us, a much more dynamic picture. The bystander has been
modernised too, now wearing a bowler hat and displaying an alert, even wary
demeanour! After all, the original picture, with its tent in the background and
the top-hatted onlooker was almost mid-Victorian!
Edison Bell Winner 2765 This totally different label was used for various
sacred recordings. I have never ascertained it definitely, but I would assume
the horse-and-jockey design was considered too ‘profane’ for records of this
nature. It was issued in February 1915. Also by now, due to the Great War, the
flood of German imports had almost disappeared. The competition being removed
enabled the remaining labels to flourish, even in Wartime conditions.
Edison Bell Winner 2831 A further re-design on the horse-race had occurred by
1916. In some ways it’s less impressive than that it supplanted, in that it has
less sense of impact. One thing that was destined never to change, though, was
the horse galloping with all four legs stretched out at once, an fallacy that
had existed from earliest times but had been ‘blown out’ by Eadwerd Muybridge’s
famous sets of sequenced photographs of moving things (including horses!) many
years before.
Edison Bell Winner 3096 By 1917, when this record was issued, the more ornate
‘twiddly bits’ of the label border had been abandoned, giving it a cleaner
appearance.
Edison Bell Winner 3275 ‘Wartime Economy’ measures now caused the colour
printing to be abandoned for this 1919 utility version. Not just Edison Bell
put such measures into operation. Even mighty HMV changed their dog from colour
to sepia to save money!
Edison Bell Winner 3379 As HMV returned the dog ‘Nipper’ to colour (by the
way, I possess an HMV of the Original Dixieland Jazz Band that has the coloured
label on one side, and the sepia on the other), so did Edison Bell, at the same
time changing the ground colour from black to bright red, or perhaps scarlet
would be a better word. Accordingly, it now quite closely resembled the basic
HMV design. The thing that lagged behind was the economy material used for the
pressings. Originally, Winner pressings were quite reasonable quality. Like
many other labels that deteriorated during the war owing to lack of imported
materials, but took some time to return to an even barely adequate standard, so
that even into 1923 they were still bad. This March 1920 issue looks great but
sounds pretty bad!
Edison Bell Winner 3862 Later in 1923, however, a complete change of design
occurred. The label got rather larger, but the border, for the time being, was
merely left wider. The paper was textured and he whole effect is very elegant.
The pressings improved greatly too. This disc is the first non-British recording
in these scans: it’s from Gennett 5005, and is by Bailey’s Lucky Seven. I don’t
know whether you will be able to see it on the web, but ‘BL7’ and ‘Ge 5005’ are
written on the label in Arthur Badrock’s meticulous handwriting. I bought this
78 nearly 35 years ago, from Derek Hamilton-Smith, but it had not managed to
elude Arthur’s ever-vigilant eyes! By the way, it was issued in October 1923.
Edison Bell Winner 3948 But the brown label was short-lived, and was changed
back to red, which preserving the ‘unframed horse’. Issued in February 1924,
this is the only Ladd’s Black Aces (The Original Memphis Five when on Gennett)
side to be issued in the U.K. It’s proper title is ‘Down Hearted Blues’. I do not
know why the title was changed: two other recordings of ‘Down Hearted Blues’
were issued here, and they were under the correct title.
Edison Bell Winner 4297 By October 1925, the design had been ‘fiddled with’,
but not a great deal. We apologise for the variations in shade on these scans,
but in some cases the lettering of the title would be unreadable if the colour
was not adjusted. This British studio band’s version of the classic
‘Charleston’ is in fact very rare, and if you have Rust & Forbes’ British
Dance Bands Book, you can fill in the space on page 196! Put it like this, if
Sandy hadn’t got it, it was bloomin’ rare!
Edison Bell Winner 4572 Electrical recording arrived. So did the demise of
the horse, which galloped wrongly, as it always had, right to the end. Instead
the Bell appeared as a trade mark. In March 1927 was issued this recording of
the studio band dutifully ‘reading off’ DEEP HENDERSON, without, I suspect,
many of the musicians having a clue as to how the score ought really to be
played! I love it, though!
Edison Bell Winner 4907 Welsh language records were
made by many companies from the earliest times. By the time this record was
issued in 1928, Edison Bell had been involved in this market for some years.
Edison Bell Winner 5500 Very much time has now passed. It was in June 1932
that this record appeared, and the writing was appearing on the wall for Edison
Bell; if, indeed, it had not already done so. The depression meant that nobody
had any money to spend on records. Edison Bell’s venture with their ‘Electron’
label was not a success, and though they did well with the 8” diameter Edison
Bell ‘Radio’ records (which we shall illustrate later), the profits made by
them were probably eaten up by continuing the main 10” Winner label. The label
design is simpler, and of smaller diameter. The shade of red is quite wrong on
this scan, but otherwise the printing could not be made legible.
Edison Bell Record 5677 We now come to the very twilight of the label. A
strange thing happened in that Decca bought up the moribund Edison Bell Winner,
mostly in order to gain control of important patents it held. But a new Edison
Bell Company was started, and carried on issuing records in the original
series. But, as the name ‘Winner’ had been sold to Decca, these are now just
called the ‘Edison Bell Record’. With the result that Edison Bell Records and
Edison Bell Winner Records were both being issued at the same time!
Edison Bell Winner W75 In fact, this Decca Winner (if you see what I mean!)
was issued in February 1934, while the Edison Bell 5677 above was issued as
late as October 1934. The public doubtless found it all very confusing, but as
they had less money than ever to spend on records, it probably didn’t matter.
The last issues of both Edison Bells appeared in January 1935.
Edison Bell W1026 This
strange, transient & very rare Edison Bell series is dealt with as part of
an inter-related ‘family’ of labels; all ten appear grouped together at the
bottom of the J - Z label page.
Embassy WB391 Of
course Woolworths (stores.. originally the ‘five and ten-cent’ store) had sold
records for many years. Woolco, Victory, Eclipse, Crown appeared roughly
between 1925 and 1938. After WW2, a 10” label called Embassy was launched,
probably around 1953/4? They were pressed by Oriole. Mostly, as far as I can
remember, they issued cover versions of current hit tunes. Also, when the
‘majors’ phased out 78s in 1959, Woolworths carried on with them for a little
longer, as shown by the date of 1960 on this label. By courtesy of Matthew
Duncan. On 14th November 2002, William Dean-Myatt kindly informed us: Embassy
WB-391 was released in April 1960, and as these records had to be produced very
quickly it was probably recorded only a week or two before. The series
started at WB-101, released November 1954 and ended at WB-678 (released January
1965) (By which time they would, of course, only have been 7” 45 rpm discs.
NF)
Empire
1564 Gramophone
Boom. An Edison Bell Winner ‘stencil’… possibly for the ‘Empire Stores’, a chain of shops?
Empire (Type 1) This
(much later) label is dealt with as part of an inter-related ‘family’ of
labels; all ten appear grouped together at the bottom of the J - Z label page.
Empire (Type 2) This
label is dealt with as part of an inter-related ‘family’ of labels; all ten
appear grouped together at the bottom of the J - Z label page.
Encore 552a Gramophone
Boom. One of the very few labels to have a different colour scheme for each
side, besides having two selections per side!
Encore 552b This
is the other side of the same disc.
Era 2464 The
Gramophone Boom. This was an early-ish, short-lived and therefore rare label,
though a lovely one. By courtesy of Mike Jones & Son.
Exo 427 An
Edison Bell ‘stencil’, alone attested by the round, punched out copyright
stamp, which I believe is totally unique to early Edison Bell Winners.
Exo D6 I
couldn’t believe my eyes when I junked this record in Gloucester about 5 years
ago. Exo is an unbelievably rare label anyhow. At last I’d found one, but it
was different! I turned it over and…
Exo D6 another
side A/B colour change disc! Now known to have been made for Morehouse by
Grammavox, indeed bearing the same catalogue number as the Grammavox original.
Famous 279 Gramophone
Boom. This should be dark green.
Famous 356 Gramophone
Boom. This one is a more accurate scan.
Favorite
1-65402 Gramophone
Boom. The ‘serial number’ should really be the catalogue number, but these
things are rather hard to decide! On 9th
August 2006, Williams Dean-Myatt kindly commented: Was issued in December 1913
and given the catalogue number 663 (from Frank Andrews).
Favorite
1-77597 Gramophone
Boom. This shows the punched out shaped holes that appear in some Favorite
labels, and stencils derived from Favorite (e.g. Lyric, below).
Fetherflex 61 Apparently
a distant precursor of Piccadilly, at least it would appear so from the label
design. Otherwise there is little in common: these rare discs were pressed into
a thinnish flexible material, and date from around 1922/3, as far as I know.
They flourished not!.
The Flag 80a Gramophone
Boom.
Frascati Alan
Selby was the established bandleader at the famous Frascati’s Restaurant in
London. They recorded for Metropole and the associated Piccadilly, but this
‘freebie’ record is rather earlier, to judge from the tune title, which was
current around 1926. The label colouring proclaims a product of Crystalate
(Imperial); Steven Walker affirms that this side did not appear on a regular
Imperial issue.
Gaelfonn
GLA-1005 “This
Scots label dates from the 1950s. They have at least 10 different catalogue
number prefixes, a system designed especially to confuse discographers. All of
their material was of Scottish interest and most was in the Gaelic language.
They recorded many notable singers when no one else had any interest in the
genre. Their best selling record was a 1960s LP – “Learn to Speak Gaelic”. Scan
and comments by courtesy of William Dean-Myatt. On 9th August 2006, Bill
commented further: This label is even more complex than I thought. I have now identified 26 different series of
78s and 24 series of 45s. I now realise
that every artist had their own catalogue number series. Listing everything in table form I can see
that certain series must exist in order to fill gaps in various sequences. The problem is that we will never know when
the catalogue is complete - I need help.
Incidentally, catalogue number prefixes starting with a 'G' are Gaelic
language, whilst items prefixed 'S' are Scottish (i.e. in English, Lallans or
Doric,).
Gamage G-570 Made
by the Vocalion group for Gamage’s, the famous London department store, circa
1922-25. Gamage’s had ‘stencil’ records before WW1. I don’t believe they had
any more after this one, though I may be wrong.
Gamage
G-697 However,
this later one was plainly made for Gamage’s by The Gramophone Company, as the
YY- master number shows. This is in fact a Zonophone number. But the pseudonym
‘Eugene Brockman’ is normally only found on the Homochord label… This is the
sort of label you dream about. By this, I don’t mean it’s a desirable disc you
know exists and simply want to find a copy. Rather, it’s the sort label you
dream about while you’re asleep: you enter a junk shop, and the record on top
of the pile is something like this one, something that should not exist…
but in defiance of all accepted principles, actually does! This label was
sent to me, and I have lost the name of the donor, sorry.
Globophon 995 Gramophone Boom.
Goodson Another
‘indestructible’ record, appearing in 1928. They were made from a cream
coloured plastic. An excellent website exists dealing with this label and other
flexible, indestructible records: http://www.people.zeelandnet.nl/koerthchkz
Goodson 140 We
just illustrate two basic Goodson records here, as Alex Revell very kindly gave
me a few recently. They have becomes quite scarce nowadays. They first appeared
around 1930. They were made of a flexible cream plastic material called
‘Rhodoid’ and were ‘unbreakable under normal use’ as the saying goes. They made
many issues, which were nearly all drawn from American Grey Gull. This scan is
of the whole record, as they had no labels! There were two basic designs used
for these discs. This is the first one.
Goodson 176 This
is the second type. These may be found without catalogue numbers, which gets
very confusing; a rather scuffed one we have here couples ‘masters’ 31250,
‘Together’ credited to Lou Gold’s Orchestra with 31210, ‘Talk About Heaven’
credited to The Pennsylvania Melody Syncopators. There is no catalogue number.
Also, the title information is shown only once on this record, as opposed to
four times as on those records illustrated here.
Great Scott A-540 “… they are very rare indeed.
Chris Hamilton gave a history of the label in "Hillandale" no. 184
and listed what he knew in issue 185. This number is missing - not
surprising as a lot of issues were for private purposes and not for general
sale. They had a numbering system that must be unique. The lower matrix
number became the catalogue number, so a sequence would be like this -
Matrix
100 Highland fling Great Scott
A-100
Matrix
101 Sword dance Great
Scott A-100
Matrix
102 Eightsome reel Great Scott
A-102
Matrix
103 Foursome reel Great Scott
A-102
Most
of their output was of Scots material but there were a few dance band sides
lurking there. They were all made between 1933/34.
John
"Dancie" Reid was a very important figure in Scots music. Born
in 1869 he became a 'dancing master' in 1892. He played the fiddle and
when giving lessons carried a 'kit fiddle' in the tails of his coat. If
he disapproved of how someone was dancing he used to hit them on the
shoulder with the fiddle bow. He won a gold medal at the national mod
held in Edinburgh in 1898.
He
recorded under his own name for Winner (5436/37) and as The New Tyle Trio
(5426/27/32/33). He died in 1942.” Scan by courtesy of Danny Letham.
Comments courtesy of William Dean-Myatt.
Guardsman 765 The
successor to Invicta, I think. Also this is post-1914; a British company.
Incidentally, the bandmaster pictured on the label was a real person, though I
can’t remember who he was. Logically, he would have been the bandmaster of a
Guards regiment.
Guardsman 860 A propos of the paper shortage at
the end of WW1, a number of records appeared with ‘Emergency Labels’. Mostly,
these seem to be products of The Sound Recording Company, which pressed (though
did not own, as far as I know) Guardsman and Popular records. Why this company
in particular was short of paper is not known; maybe it was just in a
financially weak position, and it was considered expedient to make records with
cheaper labels than not make any at all! Anyhow, the labels are austere in the
extreme, and just bear a title, hand-written in this case. And though the
catalogue and matrix numbers are given, there is no artist credit! By
courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz.
Guardsman 872 Here is another one. As
‘Inspiration Waltz’ is presumably an instrumental number, the buyer must have
been puzzled as to what sort of performers the record would have. Would it be a
full band, or maybe just a bell solo with piano accompaniment? But perhaps the
retailer had a catalogue and could inform the prospective purchaser? We wish we
could find such a Guardsman catalogue today! By courtesy of Arthur Badrock.
Guardsman
889 This
sorry, tatty example is included because it is the only example of a black label
Guardsman I have seen. It would appear that they finally started printing
labels again, but only had black paper. Before and during WW1, they had used
red, blue and violet paper for their labels. I don’t know what period each is
from, or whether they overlap, or signify different sorts of material… probably
not. But the black label does seem to be quite exceptional.
Guardsman 1007 ‘Fresh-risen
From The Wreck Of War’, the plain-ness of the design reflecting the
uncertainties of the strange era into which they had survived, this new
Guardsman is pressed from Gennett masters, a great many of which were destined
to appear in this country, though, alas, hardly any of the legendary Jazz
sides!
Guardsman 1700 By the time Guardsman pulled clear of
the uncertain period from 1918-1920 or so, it acquired what is generally
regarded as its ‘classic’ label, which is very nice… and was very exciting
when you found one in a junk pile, because by 1925, when this one dates from,
quite large quantities of delectable Jazz and Hot Dance music were appearing
from American Vocalion. Such as this one, actually by the Tennessee Tooters. By
courtesy of Ian Rance.
Guardsman 1833 As also is this one. The number of
fanciful pseudonyms employed by the inter-related labels such as Beltona (at
this period), ACO, Coliseum, Scala, Meloto &c., are wonderful in the
extreme. But, dammit, the records themselves seldom turn up.
Guardsman 1908 By
about 1922, Guardsman records were being produced by Vocalion, and, though we
said above, little from the classic Gennett repertoire appeared here, the
converse is the case with respect to Vocalion! Although the issue illustrated
here is pleasant enough, (and incredibly rare: even Sandy Forbes did not
possess this disc!), Guardsman’s chief claim to fame must lie in their
remarkable 7000 ‘Negro Race Series’ which appeared around 1925-26. Just over 30
issues (this was the label design used) ranged from Fletcher Henderson, via
the Tennesse Tooters, yea, even unto the Old Southern Jug Band. There was also
a 6000 Hebrew series, which is rarer still than the 7000 series!
Guardsman 6018 The
normal catalogue series for Guardsman in the 1920s was of course 1000. They got
up to the early 2000s before the demise of the label in 1927. They also had the
famous 7000 ‘Negro Race Series’ of just over 30 issues containing many superb
sides drawn from U.S. Vocalion. These are extremely rare. Rarer still is this
6000 Jewish series!
Guardsman 7001 The Guardsman 7000 Negro Race series
(circa 1926) are rightly regarded as Holy Grails by British record collectors…
at least those interested in Jazz and Hot Dance music! Elsewhere you can see a
6000 Jewish series, and I know, thanks to Arthur Badrock, that Guardsman
advertised Russian and Polish records. These may all have come from American
Vocalion… the 6000 one certainly did, but in the case of the Russian &
Polish issues, it is necessary first to find one in order to examine it;
and that, alas, has not yet occurred, as far as we know! By courtesy of
Arthur Badrock.
Grafton 9103 Some
Graftons were derived from American Pathé. This one, if I remember right, is
from the American label Federal. 1925?
Heart 52 Gramophone
Boom.
His
Master’s Voice (HMV) It
is only fitting that ‘Mighty HMV’ should have its own dedicated place! This
link takes you to a page devoted to the many variants (over 20) of the basic HMV
label as used on the 10” (25cm) ‘B’ series, which ran from 1912 to 1959. The
classification, kindly devised by Han Enderman, is based on the 17 types
outlined in the monumental listing of this series made by Frank Andrews and the
late Ernie Bayly. 29 different labels are to be seen here!
HMV 03240 The
many festivities celebrating the Coronation of King George the Fifth included
this stirring rendition of the National Anthem by the formidable contralto
Clara Butt.
HMV B1778, No.2 Catalogue HMV retained in catalogue a great deal
of the early material they had recorded, being aware, from earliest times, that
they were ‘God’s Wonderful Record Label’, a phrase I have coined based on
satirical references to the Great Western Railway (GWR), who fancied itself
above all other railway companies. ‘God’s Wonderful Railway’, you see! These
Dan Leno sides were obviously reissued on B1778, possibly as a ‘regular’
reissue (I don’t know) in early 1924, but were later promoted to the ‘No.2’
catalogue that usually appeared as a built-in supplement to HMV catalogues in
the 1930s. Dan Leno was of course a famous comedian, but who unfortunately
became mentally unbalanced, and was institutionalised, soon dying, about 1910?
These sides were recorded in November 1901. The other side of this disc, ‘The
Tower Of London’, had already been reissued on HMV B464, probably about 1914.
HMV GV-174 Pressed
in Britain for export to Spain, I should think, and dating from the late 1940s
or early 1950s? On 9th August, William
Dean-Myatt kindly commented: The GV series was made for export to British West
Africa but ended up going to most of West Africa and parts of East Africa. GV-1 was the seminal Latin American record,
"The Peanut Vendor" by Don Azpiazu & his Havana Casino Orchestra,
recorded NYC, 13th. May 1930. GV-150 was
the last issue. Over the course of the series they issued some fantastically
good Cuban Bands as well as material from Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Porto
Rico.
HMV EG-2102 British
HMV (EMI after 1931) could not use the dog label in Germany. (Somehow, after
the 1914-18 war, what had been the Gramophone Company in Germany managed to
become independent and, retain the rights to the dog trademark). So, doubtless
muttering darkly, the Gramophone Company started the Electrola label in Germany
with its basic EG series. However, when they made records derived from
Electrola for export to countries other than Germany, they did indeed use the
dog label, as shown here. If I’ve managed to get this right, then Electrola
EG-2102 may well be the same as this disc.
HMV EG-3985 And
just for good measure, here’s another, later one.
HMV JOM-69 Clearly
labelled for once with a date – 1953 – and a place – San Remo - this issue is
the only one with this prefix I’ve seen. Note however, that like Columbia
MC-3162 above, we have HN-3091 in small print below JOM-69. This, I guess, is
another catalogue number: I’ve seen the odd HN- series HMV; Rust says they’re
Italian (would you believe!), and who are we to argue!
Homochord 4088 The Gramophone Boom. By courtesy
of Dave Parsons.
Homochord 4146 Gramophone
Boom. Should be dark green.
Homochord H-536 One
of our standard British Homochords, from American Vocalion masters made in late
1923. What’s special about this, is that it’s probably the first appearance
over here of ‘The Charleston’, which is embodied – without mention on the label
– in this rendition.
Homochord H470 Always
a sight to raise the hopes of a jazz-orientated ‘junkshopper’, Homochord was,
at this period, pressed by Vocalion. Oddly, they were also later pressed by
Pathé, using Pathé masters of course, but were issued in the same numerical
series, but with a different prefix, namely C-. I’ve never seen a Homochord
numerical listing, but, if one exists, it would be very interesting. This
company used quite a few prefixes, H-, C-, D-, P, HD-, HR-, HN and so on. They
must certainly have known what they were doing. As for me, I haven’t a clue,
especially in the later years! However, this 1923 issue is from American
Vocalion: Ben Bernie, I think.
Homochord HR20 This
is just the sort of thing I was talking about above! They kept the same
numerical series for a long time, though different prefixes occurred. Then
suddenly it was abandoned. Maybe by this time, as they were being produced by
British Homophone (makers of Sterno records), that company swept all away and
began again. However, it availed them but little, as 78s such as the one
illustrated here are excessively rare! Circa 1934.
Homophon 6435 Gramophone Boom.
Hudson WE-1810 Dating from the early mid-1930s,
Hudson is somewhat in the way of being a ‘Library Music’ label, yet its
products were available to the public, and so it counts as a ‘normal’ record
label. It is rare, though.
Hudson WF-860 This
is a rare early 1930s label. This particular disc seems to be a dubbing of Cab
Calloway’s side recorded for Banner in March 1931, it appeared first in Britain
on the flexible Filmophone label. This Hudson issue is not shown in Rust, by
the way!
Imperial 45350 Imperial
was an important cheap label in Britain between about 1920 and 1933. This,
however, is its first appearance here, much earlier: around 1908? It shows its influence on our later, and
prolific, Imperial label. Single sided, these records were imported from the
U.S.A. for sale here. A handsome but rare label.
Imperial 45560 Just
for luck, here’s another one, which turned up in a pile of otherwise junk 78s
recently…
Imperial 1010 Interestingly,
when the Imperial marque reappeared around 1920, they adopted the same
label design as the American import, though much debased and crudely printed.
Probably the same company that imported the American discs was involved. (An
account of the U.S. Imperial label was written by Frank Andrews and appeared in
a magazine here some years ago). A very curious catalogue series was
adopted. The company had at their
disposal some sides originally recorded for other, now defunct labels. Bull Dog
was one. They put these out on Imperial, and gave them numbers running down
from 1000. New recordings, logically, went up from this number.
Imperial 1572 Definitely
a ‘cheap & cheerful’ product, with fairly gritty material and labels often
off-centre, Imperial is the British equivalent of Banner in the U.S.A, I would
think. Indeed, many sides from that label appeared in Imperial in the 1920s. It
is said that Fletcher Henderson’s ‘Everybody Loves My Baby’, represents the
first appearance on record of Louis Armstrong in this country.. This is a
re-design of the original label, c.1925.
Imperial Test This
faded item (from Tony Houghton’s album of 78 labels removed from the discs) is
included just for interest. If the tune referred to is ‘My Castle In Spain Is A
Shack In The Lane’ then it must date from 1928, but I guess this must be an
earlier song of that name.
Imperial 1699 By
1925 a new design had appeared, using two-tone sort of mauve and violet, and
remained standard for a year or two..
Imperial 2044 This
new colour combination appeared briefly around 1929, but had a relatively short
life. By courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz, who
sent this to replace the much inferior example we had before.
Imperial 2333 The
general quality of the product gradually
improved: observe the tidy printing of this new label design. The surfaces,
too, were quite commendable at this time. They tend to have a steady hiss as
surface noise, which as we all know, is far more acceptable to us today than
the horrible crackle of HMV!
Imperial 2545 A
further re-design had occurred by 1930. The surfaces remained quite good, with
only a slight tendency to grittiness.
Imperial 2677 By
1931, the results of the Depression were in evidence. Famous bandleader Jack
Payne had left the BBC, and developed a very efficient showband. He left
prestigious Columbia and became involved with the Crystalate company, putting
money into it. As you can see, his own records carried his miniature picture
and autograph. However by 1933 the Imperial marque was no longer viable
and it disappeared.
Imperial Broadcast 4036 These early 1930s records turn up from time to time
but I’m not sure who made them, or where the material came from, except
obviously from a continental European source.
Imperial
Junior 27 Here’s
a rare label for the enthusiast of ‘mini-discs’. I have not seen this colour
combination before and I wonder whether this series was made for export? The
size of the disc was, I think, 6” (~15cm), but I’ll need to check with Rainer
on that. Date ~1927. By courtesy of Dr. Rainer Lotz.
Invicta
112 Gramophone
Boom.
Click here to go to labels J -
Z. (Plus the section on the Synchrophone family.)
Page
revised 16th January 2007.