Gramophones.

 

 

Until recently, I had not owned a gramophone for thirty years. But the old ‘collecting bug’ will come out of the wall when you least expect it! So about a year ago I obtained one. It was just an ordinary cheap hornless table-top model from the mid or later 1920s. This is it:

 

It plays OK, and although the sound-box really needs an overhaul, I didn’t bother. Occasionally a 78 was played on it, and everything seemed perfectly all right. This Sterno gramophone was also pressed into use to illustrate the mounting of early electric pick-ups on an acoustic machine, as can be seen on another page of this website. But all of a sudden, another machine was purchased; a later 1920s HMV model 109, a ‘table grand’ (i.e. a table-top with a lid) albeit a German version. So it is an Electrola. This was regarded as a temporary aberration, but soon afterwards, a late 1920s Columbia model 117a suddenly made an appearance. But still: the 109 and the 117a are very common and not really expensive, so it seemed OK to have one of each. Happily, things then quietened down and I thought the craze was over. 9 or 10 months passed quietly – but then disaster struck. I returned home one day with three new machines! The situation was therefore as shown below:

                    

You will note that three of them are ‘hornless table-top’ machines. These are very much the ‘Cinderellas’ of the gramophone world, and no wonder, because they were the budget models of the time, and were almost always ‘made down to a price’. There isn’t space inside them for much of a horn, and often this modest horn doesn’t have a top because the motor is in the way. So the sound that comes from them is not usually very good. Yet for some reason they are my favourite type of gramophone. As a child I has been given a Columbia of this sort, so I suppose that is why? From left to right then, we have the original Sterno; the Electrola 109, and the Columbia 117a. Then follow the three new ones: a Zonophone of circa 1920; an anonymous machine of the mid/late 1920s, and a rather large ‘black portable’ gramophone, also anonymous, but which is unusual in having an electric motor, and so must be plugged into the mains. So in one sense, it shouldn’t really be here, as it is not a spring-driven machine… But ‘improbable hybrids’ are usually fascinating, aren’t they? 8^)

Moreover, it was decided to look these machines over, and do some minor conservation on them. The first three machines had merely been cleaned up a bit, and no mechanical work done on them. The No.4 sound-box of the Electrola 109 desperately needs a new gasket and probably a new diaphragm: the former has shrunk with age and the latter seems suspiciously thin… the sound is weak and ‘whiny’. But we didn’t bother, because the Columbia sounds really good, even though the turntable mat is shredded round the edges. Shabby genteel (I think they call it) is fine with me.

As it had been many years since I tinkered around inside gramophones, it was decided to start on the simplest machine first: the black portable. (Comment added with hindsight: it was actually quite complicated!)

So if you wish to be bored to distraction, click the following link, and you will go to a page in which the dismantled machine is gradually put back together. How I can possibly have written nearly 5,000 words doing so, I have no idea! The page is called ‘Garrard’ because the electric motor was made by them…

 

garrard.htm

 

The next machine to be looked at was the Zonophone. This was in quite good condition cosmetically. Its previous owner was obviously very good at conserving, indeed restoring, woodwork, and it looks quite smart. The winding handle might not be original, but that is a trivial point. Also, the sound-box – which definitely is original – could do with slight attention, but they usually need that anyway.

To see the work we did on this machine, just click the link below the image:

 

 

zonophone.htm

 

The third machine to be dealt with was an anonymous ‘hornless’ table model. This came in very cheap, so it didn’t matter all that much whether it worked well or not. However, we have always had a tendency to be ‘the champion of the under-dog’, if you catch my meaning. So this cheap and delicate single-spring machine tugged somewhat at our heart-strings in a way the tough, chunky Zonophone above did not. (The Zono. appealed of course, just because it was ‘tough and chunky’!) So what have we got here? Click the link below the image to find out…

 

 

 

unknown.htm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page started 26th September 2009.

Added to, 25th October 2009.